GOY GUIDE TO WORLD HISTORY: THE „RUSSIAN“ REVOLUTION „There’s never been a revolutionary movement that was all Jews. But the Jews invariably assumed a leadership role in this [Russian] revolutionary movement – because they were taught to be ruthless. Against whom?
–
The goyim. It was a virtue to be ruthless to the goyim. You can say, okay, it was just cheating them economically. But that’s a form of aggression. And you were taught if you cheated the goyim you didn’t have to feel guilty. And so it’s only a step there from taking, you know – to executing the goyim. Salo Baron, after the Revolution, talked about the Cheka, which was the secret police – Lenin staffed it with Jews. Of course he knew the Jews would be merciless. A Russian might have qualms about killing another Russian but a Jew wouldn’t have any qualms about torturing Russians — because THOSE PEOPLE TREATED MY GRANDPARENTS BADLY. You find this throughout Jewish history. It’s always the rationalization – whether it’s usury, whether it’s on Wall Street. Goldman Sachs shorting stocks that they just sold to somebody, the Greeks for example.
–
Or whether it’s the Cheka torturing Russians – the Jews in the Cheka torturing Russians. It’s always this rationalization, ‚You people treated my people badly.‘ It’s in Philip Roth, where he’s ’shtupping the shiksa‘ because he’s ‚getting back for the way they treated my grandfather in Russia. It’s this type of asocial behavior that creates this animosity. It is something that goes deep, this Jewish hatred of Russia.“ Illustrating E Michael Jones‘ observations, part 6 quickly reviews (via photos) the Jewish „leadership role“ in the „Russian“ Revolution. The photos note the cause and date of death of individuals. Counted also among the ‚leadership‘ are not just important Jewish Bolsheviks, but key Mensheviks, Social Revolutionaries, and significant assassins. And most importantly, the financiers: Schiff, Warburg, Rothschild – and the fixers such as Parvus (Helphand), Ganetsky, et al. The story of London Times journalist Robert Wilton (author of the 1920 book, The Last Days of the Romanovs) demonstrates the insidious capitulation by the British goy establishment.
–
The highly-respected correspondent in Russia was not allowed to tell the story of the Jewish-dominated 1917 revolution. His insightful reports were rejected as anti-semitism. The story is told in Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion. Wilton personally investigated, under war time conditions, the Romanov murders, reporting on it in his book: „…deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov…and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.“ Similarly, other observers, such as ambassadors to Russia, David R. Francis (US) and William Oudendyk (Netherlands) warned their respective governments of the „alien invasion,“ views reflected by the great Russian writer, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: „The leading Bolsheviks were not Russians. They hated Russians.
–
They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse…“ And Winston Churchill, in 1920, bravely called attention to the power and prominence of Jews in the leadership and institutions, singling out the dreaded Cheka as an example. Scenes from Alexander Rogozhin’s 1992 film, „The Chekist“ demonstrate the power of ethnic identity and/or ideology in „rejecting Logos“ — or inuring groups of their natural compassion for others; or inducing psychopathy. Henry Makow calls attention to Estonian filmmaker Jyri Lina who demonstrates, in his book, „Under The Sign Of The Scorpion“, that the orders to kill the Romanovs came from Schiff in New York, not Lenin and Sverdlov in Moscow. Soros knows he who pays the piper calls the tune. For a while.
